Latency drift · 3 regions · risk 0.94
Recommend
Anomaly · kafka-ingest-04 lag
Watching
Sentinel learns your baseline silently for 30 days before it ever recommends a thing. Then it surfaces the five things your team should actually look at — not ten thousand they shouldn't.
30d
10k → 5
94%
Every new Sentinel deployment ships in zero-write observe mode. For the first 30 days it reads your environment, learns your traffic shapes, your seasonality, your normal. It builds the baseline from your data — not a synthetic one.
Then, and only then, does it start scoring signals. Your security team watched it think for a month before it ever proposed an action. That's why it survives the risk committee.
Sentinel doesn't surface alerts. It surfaces signals — each one scored against business impact, topology blast radius, and historical severity. Five signals beats ten thousand alerts every shift.
The risk score isn't a magic number. It's the model's reasoning — exposed, replayable, defensible. Every signal comes with the why, not just the what.
The reason five signals beats ten thousand alerts is the graph. Sentinel maintains a continuously-updated graph of your services, their dependencies, their owners, their SLOs, and their runbooks — and reasons across all of it.
When p95 jumps in three regions, Sentinel doesn't fire three alerts. It traces the dependency, finds the common upstream, and surfaces one signal with the topology attached.